Abstract:
Liquefaction is a phenomenon where a saturated soil can temporarily lose its shear strength
during an earthquake as a result of the development of excess pore pressures. For the past
25 years since liquefaction phenomenon was first explained, it was thought to be mainly a
problem with clean sand, and most of the research has focused on these soils. However, as
case history information has come to light, it has become apparent that silty sands are commonJy
involved, and in some cases even silts. This has generated a need for knowledge about
the response of silty sands and silts under seismic loading .. Related to this issue is the
question of how best to determine the liquefaction resistance of these soils in a practical setting.
This research has the objectives of providing an understanding of the behavior of saturated
silty sands under seismic loading, and developing a rational basis for the use of the Cone
Penetration Test· (CPT) to predict liquefaction.resistance in these materials. The study is primarily
experimental, relying on laboratory and field testing and the use of a unique, large
scale calibration chamber. The calibration chamber allows the field environment to be duplicated
in the laboratory where conditions can be closely controlled and accurately defined.
One of the first problems to be overcome in the research was to determine how to prepare
specimens of silty sands that would reasonably duplicate field conditions in both the small
scale of the conventional laboratory tests, and the large scale of the calibration chamber. Out
of four different methods explored, consolidation from a slurry proved to be best. Two silty
sands were located which had the desired characteristics for the study. Field work, involving
both the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and CPT was done as part of this investigation. The
behavior of the silty sands were determined in the laboratory from monotonic and cyclic
loading tests.
The test results show that the effect of fines is to reduce the cone penetration resistance, but
not to affect the liquefaction resistance. The steady state shear strength of the soils seems
to be correlated to the cone tip resistance, however, this correlation shows a higher steady
state shear strength than those back figured from case history data. The results were also
used to define state parameters for both of the soils tested. The state parameter was found
to be a reliable index to the liquefaction potential and further study in this area is recomended.